My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:42:11 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:34:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Flit •04.29T7 <br />January 20.2C04 <br />Patt3arn <br />Structural Coveraee <br />j Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />j Allowed: <br />I Proposed: <br />68,897 s.f. (1.S8 acres)10,335 s.f (15%) <br />11.032 s.f (16%) <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />Staff did not require that the applicant submit the hardcover calculations :n zones <br />Rather, the applicant had a hardcover analysis completed of the entiie property as the <br />building is approximately 1,000’ from Lake Minnetonka, although the southwest comer <br />of the property is approximately 200’ from the lagoon that extends north of the main <br />water body. Staff concluded that an analysis of the entire property was appropriate as the <br />majority of commercial properties do not meet the hardcover requirements, whether <br />figured in zones or not. Hardcover on the properly consists of the following (see arached <br />Exhibit L for more detailed infomiation)- <br />Total Area of <br />Properly <br />Allowed , <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />68.897 s f <br />24.1l4s.i <br />(35% assuming <br />entire property | <br />is in the 500- <br />100* zone) <br />62,106 s.f <br />1 (90%) <br />62,106 s f. <br />(90%) <br />' NO <br />CHANGES <br />PROPOSED <br />Hardcover Analysis <br />Because the applicant is proposing site improvements associated with the commercial site <br />plan review a hardcover analysis is lequired. As stated above, the hardcover was figured <br />for the entire site rather than zones due to the commercial nature of the property and tlie <br />amount of liardcover tlut currently exists. <br />The proposal doesn ’t include any new hardcover. The major changes that should be <br />noted arc the entryways and awning which will be placed over existing hardcover The <br />non-hardcover areas of the site are a small area of grass along Uie southern hour. ’ iry of <br />the sue facing residential propeny and a smaller. un>kept landscape area between tl:e <br />retaining walls separating the lower parking lot from the upper parking lot (see Exhibit <br />04). The propc-ed hardcover breakdov n is as follows (see attached Exhibit L) <br />BUILDING 1 1.032 s.f ' <br />LOWER LEVEL GARAGE 2.671 s f. j <br />BITUMINOUS PARKING AREA i1 33.376 sf <br />CONCRETE WALLS |1 2.811 sf j <br />GRAVEL PARKING AREA '11.391 sf <br />RETAINING WALLS 825 s.f 1 <br />TOTAL 90% 1 <br />HARDSHIP <br />The nature of this particular property is retail establishments at the from of the building
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.