Laserfiche WebLink
rUt ■04-2977 <br />April 16,2004 <br />Page I oft <br />16H7 <br />5. Should the non-confbnnmg sign st the Kelly Avenue entrtnee receive s <br />viriencc to itey in that location? Do the retaining walls and large right-of- <br />way create hardships to allow it to renudn? <br />6. Is a restaurant with liquor appropriate? Or, does it have the potential for too <br />many negative impacts to the surrounding neighborhood? <br />7. Would the Plaimmg Commismr>r ■t^'rove a CUP for a restaurant without <br />liquor? <br />t. Are there any other issues wiu. a i plication? <br />Stair Racoramcadation <br />Planning Department staff recommends denial of the request for a CUP and associated <br />commercial site plan review with variances for a restaurant with liquor (Class II)- Staff <br />would recommend that the ^>plicant entatain a restaurant use without liquor (Class I) <br />and that the Planning Commission discuss vdiat would be appropriate under that use.