My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:42:11 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:34:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday. March 22.2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.ra. <br />White moved and Mayor Petenoo leconded to fraot conceptual approval for a <br />Comprcbcotive Plan amendment to reflect Che conditions in the March 1,2004 <br />letter. <br />Discussion was opened and Moorse commented to clahfy what the expectations are that: <br />1) We don't want to say we axe approving 30,000 square feet of retail Instead we want <br />to be more specific and he believes the phaimacy is key to this site and if the pharmacy <br />is gone and we are just trying to fill up the space that is a different plan than is being <br />talked about here. <br />Gafliron stated that the City will establish parameters in the Comp Plan for development <br />of this Outlot A that will include whatever conditions felt appropriate, whether this <br />developer or any developer. <br />Moorse responded to the applicant that we wouldn't amend the Comp Plan to simply say <br />“retail". We amend the Comp Plan to say it’s fine to do retail in this area verms office <br />as long as the retail serves the neighborhood and fits these parameters. One of the <br />parameters Moorse suggests would be it has to be a pharmacy or something that provides <br />the same type of service uses that a phannacy provides. <br />2) Moorse continued to say that the other thing be would suggest is the fiur westerly <br />space hu to be food oriented if it is all going to be retail because if it's not then we have <br />wasted that whole building. <br />Applicant stated tiiey have to get closer to the PUD using those parameters. Mocrse <br />stated it is not just the PUD. it is the Comp Plan Amendment language where the City <br />would lay out those parameters so it is not a wide-open amendment. <br />Gtffion stated to ipplicaat that the rezoning goes band-in-hand with the PUD. <br />L <br />11 • , li PAQB23ot» , ; . . <br />illiitlli I ilittlil!lilJl i iiiil IsiI lik jlitsifcliil 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.