04-19-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

*04-2974 Sloatbay Markrlplacc April IS. 1004 Past 10 4. The City Engineer has not had adequate time to review engineering matters for this new plan set 5. Does Planning Commission have any problems with ilie proposed height of the buildings (all expected to meet the 30’ limit except the Walgreens comer feature). 6. Applicant must address the enclosure and screening of trash facilities. 7. To whai exicni are addiiional trees needed along the Willow Drive and Highway 12 frontages? 8. Applicant must submit revised building elevations and should also provide perspective, oblique views to help PC assess the building proximity lack of separation impacts. 9. Applicant should provide options for facade coloration for review. 10. Applicant should fiirther refine the rigJit-in, right-out acccssand the dead-end parking tunuruund per the recommendations of the City Engineer. 11. Applicant should address the loading berth issue 12. Planning Commission should consider vvhetlicr tite 6-siall parking shortage (b.ised on City Code) isacccptablegiven Walgreens history of parking needs, the proof of parking available, and the current mix ofuses that does not include a free-standing family restaurant, w hich \\ ould have greater parking needs than can be accommodated at the proposed lev cl of retail space (1 stall per 80 s.f rather than 1 stall per 150 s f). 13. Applicant must provide a detailed signage plan for all buildings and for site monument signs. 14. Applicant must provide a plan for building-mounted ligliting. and confirm the design of the parking lot fixtures. 15. PlanningCommissionshouldconsidcr whctherthecombinalionofbuildingproximityvisual impacts, the pcdcstnan tetrace amenity placed on the adjacent NlnDOT parcel, the ov crage in lot cov crage, and other site factors suggest the need for further building down sizing on the west lot. Any other issues for consideration.