Laserfiche WebLink
r'•04-2974 StOMbav MtrtittpUcc <br />April IS, 2004 <br />PiftT <br />Siielly has suggested an alternative turnaround layout for the dead-end parking lot at the <br />southwest comer of the sue. <br />LotCoverafe. Code Section 78-1 403 limits lots of 0-1.99 acres in area to 15% lot coverage by <br />structures: <br />• Lot 1 (86,268 s.f or 1.9S acres) is proposed uith buildings totaling 13.930 s.foi 16.1%co\erage <br />• Lot 2 (74.428 s f) Is proposed uith buildings toultng 14,820 s f or 19.9% coverage <br />• Overall coverage of the 3 69 acre sue is proposed at 17.9 Vo, not including freestanding trash <br />enclosures. <br />Planning Commission should detennine whether there :s sufi:cicni reason to allow the exccssis e lot <br />coverage for this property and the proposed uses Overall lot coverage of 15®o would >-ield <br />24.104 s.f as compared to the 28,750 s f proposed <br />Loading Berths Code Sections 78-1536 thru 1542 provide standards forthcicquircmentof <br />loitlingberths for vanous tvpes ofbuildurgs. Any rcta;*. officebuiUnig greater than 6.000 s f floor <br />area requires a loading berth 25' in length. Applicants should define the location and detail of <br />loading berths for the Walgiccns and the ca.sieily retail building. <br />Trash Enclosures .As noted in the landscaping scctionabovc.trashhandling faciliticsmustbe <br />fully OKlusod &oin V icw citlmw iThin a building or in a detached stiuctuic. .Applicants must p:o\ ide <br />detail of how trash handling will be accomplished or. each site. <br />Required Parkin f Based on Orono codes for a strictly retail site, and using a standard 10*« <br />reduction from the gross floor area for stall calculation, tltc proposal requires a total of 11*3 parking <br />stalls. The sue .’Ian pros ides U'7 stalls. iiKluding 145 standards stall.s, plus 5 HC accessible stalls, <br />and P proot wr oatking* stalls <br />lUqMired Slalb Frepofcd Stalls Addt'l. <br />Parking <br />Total Proticicd <br />(by Loll <br />%% sigrmi! <br />(I4J20 If! 0.9/ISO) <br />•<9 (60)*60* <br />(54 on Lot 2) <br />10 Proof <br />2HC <br />Lol 2i <br />S4<^ 12-66 <br />Ea«l Rclati BHilding <br />h.9’0»(x0.9 ISO) <br />54 <br />84 85 <br />(91 on Lot 1) <br />7 Proof <br />3HC <br />Lol 1: <br />91 ♦ 10-10’ <br />V^rtt Mrlail Ru.'dinf <br />(4.960 tlx 0.9 I54M <br />30 <br />Total! j 173 (!44)«145 22 167 <br />•City con»u!unu lia\c .lai.'jtrd ihji ii Mould be teasonible lo accept the Walgreen! model fo» a 60 iiall <br />renuuemenr W alg-eent *ias lubiunnal experience in deieimining their parking needi <br />The ‘proofofpa-dcing’ stalls are located in landscaped areas where it w ould be p-eferable to not <br />construct them until'unlcss they are needed. With proof of parking, the site is short only 6 stalls <br />bas«l strictly on Orono code. It should be noted that if all proof-of-parking stalls w ere <br />constructed, overall green space would reduce from 26% to 24% of the site.