My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:42:11 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:34:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lyi <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(MIKE KEAVENY ON BEH aLF OF RICHARD M. KEAVENY REV. TRUST. 3425 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND COMMERCIAL SITE <br />PLAN REVIE\\' - Continued) <br />Keaveny indicaleJ that the ;cceptacle was proposed for the southeast comer and would be <br />fenced. <br />Gaffron believed the applicants could find a bener location for the trash receptacle, further <br />away from the access and neighborhood. <br />Keaveny stated that he would propose placing a monument sign and planter box directing <br />people on Shoreline Dr. to the Pizza Factory and bowling alley off Kelly Avenue. <br />Gundlach pointed out that the sign located in the right-of-way of Kelly Avenue would be <br />removed in conjunction with a new sign to be erected in the northeast comer of the lot <br />Smaller directional signs would be placed below to mark the access. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth encouraged tlie applicant to talk to the Public Works department <br />about the proposed location of the signage and monument sign as they might interfere with <br />sight lines. <br />Gundlach noted that the lighting plan would include illumination for the stairwell and staff <br />would recommend that all lights be shielded and directed downward elsewhere on site. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth stated that she would support a monument sign at the northeast <br />comer of Kelly Avenue and Shoreline Drive versus a pole sign. <br />Fritzlcr pointed out that a pole light would interfere less with si^t lines at the comer. <br />Keaveny agreed that a pole sign with a planter and signs on it would be less obtrtish'c. <br />Gaffron acknowledged that a monument sign would have the potential to cause problems <br />In reference to the ’hours cf operation’, Bremer questioned whether delivery would be <br />envisioned in the plan. <br />While he anticipated it could be planned for at a later date, Ode was unsure at this time <br />whether delivery times would be an option. He indicated that his preferred hours of <br />operation would be noon - 1 :00 A M. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth maintained that there were many other open issues as w ell, <br />including resolution of the bus shelter location. <br />Fritzlcr acknowledged that patrons may decide to use Kelly Avenue to cut over *die County <br />PAGE 50 of 53 <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.