My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:42:11 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:34:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 20,2004 <br />6.00 o’clock p.m. <br />(MIKE KEAV K VY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD M. KEAVENY REV. TRUST, 3425 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND COMMERCIAL SITE <br />PLAN REVIEW - Continued) <br />Gundlach continued that the applicant's intended restaurant lessee originally contacted <br />staff in early September :nqu;nng about needed approvals :n order to operate a restaurant <br />out of the existing building which is currently ’xnown as Navarre Lanes bowling alley and <br />The Cnb. It was indicated at that time that restaurants needed a conditional use permit. <br />Following that initial telephone conversation. Planning Department staff met with the <br />building owner, Michael Keaveny and the intended restaurant lessee, Paul Ode to discuss <br />the proposal. Staff was given a tour and explained the extent of the restaurant use and the <br />proposed n^ provements associated with the restaurant. Following that meeting staff sent a <br />memo indicating the required submittals and approvals needed in order to operate the <br />restaurant, which would require a conditional use permit and a commercial site plan <br />review. The applicant has now submitted application for a comir.crcial site plan review <br />and conditional use permit m order to conduct building impro\emcnts and to operate a <br />restaurant. The property is located at 3425 Shoreline Dn\c in the Navarre area of Orono. <br />While the proposal doesn’t include any new hardcover, the major changes that should bo <br />noted arc the cnlryways and awning which will be placed over existing hardcover. The <br />non-hardcover areas of the site arc a small area of grass along the .southern boundary of the <br />site facing residential property and a smaller, un-kept landscape area between the retaining <br />walls separating the lower parking lot from the upper parking lot. <br />Gundlach pointed out that Section 78-1403 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that all <br />properties in all zoning districts be subject to 15% m.aximum sirucmral coverage. The only <br />changes the applicant is proposing which affect the sites structural coverage is two <br />entryways and an awning. The applicant has stated that these entryways arc proposed to <br />help control heating and cooling costs and tr provide safer and more inviting entrances to <br />the building. The intention of the aw ning is to provide for a covered walk. The eastern <br />enlryway is proposed at 600 square feet (50 ’ x 12’) a.nd the western entrywr/ is proposed <br />at 36 square feet (6* x 6*). The proposed awuing whll extend along the south elevation of <br />the building to cover the current sidewalk. The structural coverage ordinance allows for <br />overhangs to be included in the building square footage when they are 2’ or less in w idth. <br />The awnings proposed are 4’ in width and extend 97.5 feet, adding 292.5 square feet of <br />structural coverage (2* of awning x 97.5'). This is a total of 923.5 square feet (If c of total) <br />of additional structural coverage, or 16®/o where the existing percentage is 15®/a <br />Gundlach indicated that it isn’t out of the ordma.-y for structural coverage \ ananccs to be <br />granted for commercial properties. In fact, variances in the past have been granted to <br />allow for up to 20®/* or 30®/* for commercial properties. <br />Gundlach encouraged the Planning Commission to consider requiring the gravel parking <br />area to meet the required setbacks of 20’ to Shoreline Drive and 10’ to Kelly Avenue in an <br />PAGE 41 of 53
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.