My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:30:22 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:22:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FILE«04-29M <br />27 Fa6ru«ry2004 <br />Pt9t4of4 <br />Staff finds that a hardship exists due to the challenging lakeshore portion of the lot and <br />the need for the hardcover (stairs), justifies granting the variance request for the minor <br />reduction in hardcover. <br />Conditional Use Pcrniit Analysis <br />A thorough evaluation of the water body and the topographic, vegetation and soils <br />conditions on the site have been made, and are addressed by the following: <br />• The prevention of soil erosion or the possible pollution of public waters, both <br />during and after construction; Steps have been taken to address possible soil <br />erosion during and after construction. <br />• The visibutvy v/ $trjctures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is <br />limited; Visibility of the steps and the walls will be minimized by vegetation <br />plantings which will screen the proposed structures. <br />• The site is adequate for water supply and on-site sewage treatment; Xot <br />applicable. <br />• The types, uses and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate are <br />compatible in relation to the suitability of public waters to safely accommodate <br />these watercraft; Not explicable. <br />City Engineer, Tom Kellogg, has reviewed the site and has provided staff with a <br />recommendation (the letter is attached as Exhibit E). The following is a summary of <br />Kellogg’s comments: <br />• The proposed wall will not exceed 3 * in height and will be screened with vegetation. <br />The wall construction is acceptable from an engineering standpoint provided the <br />installation is in accordance with the plans and specifications provided. <br />• Heavy duty silt fence with steel imposts must be installed along the shoreline <br />immediately to protect the exposed slope. The silt fence should be maintained <br />throughout the construction process and remain in place until the slope is stabilized <br />and vegetation is established. <br />Issues for CousidcratioD <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Rccommcndalion <br />Planning Department staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to the City <br />Engineer’s recommendations.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.