Laserfiche WebLink
Datt AppIlcatfM Rtcdvtd: 7-11^3 <br />Datt AppUciMoa Coatidtrtd as Cempklt: 7*11-03 <br />M-Day Review rirtod EipIrM: 9-16-03 •i-zi-oW <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Sabject: <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Mike GafTron, Planning Director <br />August 11,2003 <br />#03-2928 Michael Mischke, 1972 Shadywood Road - Variances <br />- Public Hearing <br />Zoalag District: LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1/2-acre min. <br />Lot Area: 0.16 acre (6,915 s.f.) <br />Apptiauisn Smmmary: Applicant requests a number of variances to construct an attached <br />garage and second-story addition to the existing residence. The variances include: <br />1. Second story structure encroaching within 0-75* setback zone, 46* fhmi shoreline. <br />3. Second story addition encroaching 2.9 feet from left side lot line. <br />4. Two story garage structure encroaching 6.9 feet from right side lot line. <br />5. Two story garage structure encroaching 1 2.5 feet from street lot line. <br />6. Hardcover in 0-75’ reductions proposed from 1630 s.f.(31.6%) to 1000 sf (19.4%) where <br />no hardcover is allowed, by removing existing detached garage and gravel areas. <br />7. Hardcover in 75-250* zone will be reduced from 1216 sf(69.5%) to 952 sf (54.4%). <br />Additional factors: <br />- Lot coverage by structure increases from 1333 s.f. to 1500 s.f. (1500 s.f allowed). <br />- Adjoining residence to the immediate north is 4-5* away from this residence (separation <br />between fireplace chases is 1 .7*). <br />Staff R€C9MmemSaii»m: Staff recommends: <br />a) Approval of the side and street setback variances for the garage addition (see <br />discussion). <br />b) Conditional approval of the side setback and lakeshore setback for the second story <br />additions - to be somewhat consistent with recent approvals of similar simaiioos, should at <br />least be offset to maintain 10’ separation from neigh^ring residence structure (i.e. only a <br />1 -2’ encroachment of side yard); however, denial would not be inconsistent with recent <br />approvals, primarily to maintain at least a bit of visual openness, but also to avoid fimire <br />maintenance issues... <br />c) Approval of hardcover proposal. <br />ListofExhIblU <br />A - Application <br />B - Hardship Statement <br />C - Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />D - Proposed Plans & Elevations <br />E - Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />F - Photos <br />G - Property Owners List <br />H • Plat map