My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
03-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:30:22 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:22:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 18,2003 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#9 #03-2928 MICHAEL R. MISCHKE, ContiBned)---------------------------------------- <br />pointed out that the applicant would be gaining only half the second story size he <br />desired if it were stepped back and slid into the garage. <br />Mischke indicated that he would need to determine how the 10’ requirement the Planning <br />Commission was recommending would impact the design of the home. <br />Chair Smith suggested the Commission toble the appUcation for redesign purposes. <br />Mischke asked if the Commission could approve a portion of the design in order to allow <br />him to proceed with the garage addition. <br />Ga^n felt this would be difficult given the proposed second story above the garage, since <br />the Planning Commission had not yet determined their comfort level uith the entire <br />property. <br />Mischke asked for Anther direction. <br />Chair Smith stated that she would be comfortable with the staff recommendation. <br />fa addition. Rahn asked the applicant to include a 1 O’ setback from the garage and no <br />further encroachment on the other side. <br />Hawn recommended that the applicant have the foundation evaluated to ensure it could <br />support a second story before proceeding. <br />Km Hutton. 1835 Shadywood Roa4 fell that, aesthetically, the design would be a nice <br />change. <br />Mijchke .wed that he alio had 1 signed letter ofnippoit font the neighbor on the <br />Hawa move^ Raha lenaded, to tabk Appllcadoa »03-292«, Mfchael Mkchke. 1972 <br />Shadywood Road, for the purpose of redesign. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Mischke asked if other Commissioners, as well as Raha, were opposed to leavine the <br />garage where proposed. ® <br />Hawn and Chair Smith indicated that they were not against it <br />While he empathized with the applicant Rahn staled that he was against it from the <br />sli^int that there shouU be access to the lakeside hom at least one side of the home for <br />mamtenance, as well as, safety reasons. <br />PAGE 13 of 30
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.