My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
02-17-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:14:32 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:06:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M4.2971 3210-324I Watertown Road <br />Jaaiiary 14,2004 <br />Pa|c3 <br />///. OHWL and Ftoik^flain impacts <br />The Zoning Code defines the OHWL for watercourses as “the elevation of the lop of the bank of the <br />channel". It also establishes the "Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation ” (RFPE) as an elevation <br />no less than 1.0 fool above the ‘regional flood', i.e. 1' above the 100-year floodplain elevation. <br />The Surface Water Management Plan indicates that the Normal Water Level for the large wetland <br />basin just to the north of the property is elevation 963.5', with the High Water Level (100-year flood <br />level) at elevation 970.4*. The top of the Hank of the channel at the constriction area in Lot 1 is at <br />approximate elevation 968.0', and closely matches the delineated wetland boundary. In recent <br />discussions with the City Engineer, staff has concluded that the OHWL for setback and lot area <br />calculation purposes for this property should be established at the wetland boundary elevation of <br />968'. The RFPE, i.e. the minimum floor elevation for any building, should be established at <br />elevation 971.4’, <br />In proposed Lot 1, it appears that neither the buildable area nor the septic sites v^ill be impacted by <br />floodplain and OHWL elevations. However, the creek driveway crossing will likely require filling <br />within floodplain as well as wetland. <br />/K Front Lot/Baek Lot Impacts <br />The original subdivision was created prior to the 1994 adoption of "ftont lot/back lot" standards <br />(Sections 78-1370 and 82-256). The existing lots aren ’t subject to these special setback and area <br />requirements, but because new lots are being created, the subdivision will be subject to those <br />standards. The impacts include: <br />- Lot 1 as a back lot must meet a 3 acre minimum (it does); <br />- Lot 1 is subject to 150% of the standard setbacks (See staff sketch. Exhibit C2). <br />• Access to Lot I must be via a 30' driveway outlot (as proposed) <br />- Lot 2 is subject to a 50* side street setback from the driveway outlot, rather than a 30' side <br />setback. <br />Summary of Regulatory Impacts <br />I. The 968’ OHWL along the creek is the contour from which setbacks should be measured for <br />this property. The key OHWL setbacks that affect development of the site are: <br />- 100* stnicmre setback from OHWL <br />• 75'septic setback from OHWL <br />- no hardcover allowed within 75' of OHWL <br />Areas below the OHWL will not count toward lot area calculations. <br />The lot dry/wei areas and the OHWL setbacks as shown by the sur\ cyor appear to be <br />accepuble.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.