My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
02-17-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:14:32 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:06:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Summers stated that the driveway outlet was of great concern to him, since the driveway would run <br />the entire length of his property. <br />Although one option might include moving the driveway further west by widening the driveway, <br />Gtffron noted that widening too much would impact the septic sites and house size. <br />Koehler pointed out that drainage issues might also be a concern for the future homeowner as the <br />runoff tends to move towards this site and under Watertown Road via a culvert. <br />Gaffron thanked the neighbor for his concern, and acknowledged that the City Engineer would <br />need to evaluate the drainage issues, and how these might impact construction. He mentioned that <br />some buffers would be likely to manage treatment near the creek, and noted chat the applicant <br />hopes to have these issues resolved by the February meeting. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth questioned how the applicant would plan to cross die creek. <br />While the City would need confirmatton from the MCWD, Gaffron stated that a 48** oval culvert <br />with fill on eidwr side was proposed to accommodate flow. He noted that MCWD may even take <br />the position that the applicant can’t build over the creek bed. <br />Henderson stated that, having spoken with the MCWD, he had been led to believe that they would <br />accept this proposal. <br />While Acting Chair Mabusth stated that she would End it difficult to require »dditionsl park <br />dedication fees and stormwater trunk fees being charged to the applicant, she would defer this to <br />the legsl department <br />Hawn concurred. <br />ActlBg Chair Mabusth moved, Bremer seconded, to table AppBcatiou tH)4-297], William and <br />Roslyn Hcudersoii,/Hickory Flue Homes, 322OJ240 Wstertowu Road, a proposed <br />Prelimliiary Subdivision and Lot Line Re-Plat pending receipt ud Oty Engineer review of <br />PAGE 30 of 64
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.