Laserfiche WebLink
1>eAfpr" <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />from creeks and wetlands since the late I970's; tested sites for Lot I were accepted at less than a <br />7S'setback. <br />Since the original subdivision was created prior to the 1994 adoption of “front lot/back lot” <br />standards (Sections 78*1370 and 82>2S6), die existing lots aren't subject to these special setback <br />and area requirements, but because new lots are being created, the subdivision will be subject to <br />those standards. The impacts include: <br />• Lot I as a back lot must meet a 3 acre tmnitmim (it does); <br />• Lot 1 is subject to 1S0% of the standard setbacks. <br />• AcceutoLot I mustbe via a 30* driveway outlot (as proposed) <br />• Lot 2 is subject to a SO* side street setback from the driveway outlet, rather than a <br />30* side setback. <br />Gafifron lutranarized die Regulatory Impacts as follows: <br />1. <br />for <br />The 968' OHWL along the creek is the contour from which setbacks should be measured <br />this property. The key OHWL setbacks that affect development of the site are: <br />• 100* structure setback from OHWL <br />• 75' septic setback from OHWL <br />• no hardcover allowed within 75'of OHWL <br />Areu below the OHWL will not count toward lot area calculations. <br />The lot dry/wet areas and the OHWL setbacks as shown by the surveyor appesr to <br />be acceptable. <br />Wetland delineations and the OHWL determination have established boundaries which have a <br />somewhat limiting effect on the buildable area, especially of Lot I, due to non-buddability of <br />wetland and the 26' setback requirement. <br />4. The original approvals to construct a driveway within existing Outlot A die <br />creek, and to construct a creek crossing, are no longer valid, because the driveway and creek <br />crossing were never constructed and new, more restrictive regulations have since bees adopted <br />which would make such construction a violation of current codes. A number of variancea are <br />PAGE 26 of 64