Laserfiche WebLink
JohnTrautz <br />December 16» 2003 <br />Page 2 <br />Signage and believe it should not be incorporated into >our plan. <br />?lle U y 9u 1 apd C»m>lad9n. We have concerns rep:ding three speciSc areas of <br />the sue Pint, the area ^lu'ccn the bank and the Wa:5rceas drive-through seems <br />ex^ely narrow arid is a potential congestion point, with vehicles using the <br />n^t-in Kcess ^cdiately encountering the primar.- driveway entrances for both <br />the bank and the TOgrcens. Adding to this, the main parking area for bank <br />patrons requires backing into the main driving lane, and the Walgreens drive-thru <br />vondow entrance requires a lane crossing at mid-blcck. Further, with the limited <br />bank parkmg bank customers during busy periods might see fit to park at the <br />° and add a pedestrian element to this <br />Uu^oncem ^ conflict area needs f-nhcr refinement to address <br />leaves no dedicated north-south pedestrian walkwa/dirough the center of tTc rile <br />counleq?roductive in the scheme of the otherwise pedestrian-feicadly amenities <br />parking op^si^*^th^<^ between the <Ly-c!eaner driye-ihru md the <br />supports, adding to the visual cluSr!° backing into the canopy <br />Third, we question the need for a double one-way lane at the west end of the strio <br />center. tbwe is a potential or long-term intent for this to become a drive-thru, <br />we would hkc to know that up front. We would oppose a drive-thm at^t <br />location, and would prefer that the second lane become green space. <br />Landscjipinqapd Green Space . We would prefer fr.-: all green spaces shown on <br />your site plan be vegetated with grass and/or t..*e$ zrA shrubs. We also <br />acknowicdge that some of the small green spaces shown will be difficult or