My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
01-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:15:37 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:06:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
520
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
exhibit g <br />ife-P <br />THIS ITEM HH beck <br />City of OROIVfgfciiOFlUllED <br />it--. <br />HONQ <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 22E4_________ <br />A RESOLOTION GRARTIIIQ <br />A VARIAMCB TO <br />MUNICIPAL XOHING COOB <br />SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br />FILE #1206 <br />WBBRBAS, Katherine C. Perry (hereinafter "the applicant") is the <br />owner of the property located at 2693 Kelly Avenue within the City of Orono <br />(hereinafter "City”) and legally described as follows: <br />Block 2, Carman Cove, Her.r.spin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the <br />property")! and <br />WBBRBAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the <br />construction of a deck and scr«en porch located 32 feet from the side <br />street lot line where a 35 foot lide street setback is normally required. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE 17 RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File <1206. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Coinnission reviewed this application on October <br />19, 1987, and recommended etproval of the proposed variance based upon <br />the following findings: <br />A) Moving the wall cf the porch to meet the 35* required setback <br />would place the wall in conflict with existing door and window <br />locations. <br />B) The porch and detk as proposed will have no significant <br />visual effect on the cr.aracter of the neighborhood. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and recommendaticr.s of the Planning Commission, reports by <br />City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />rage 1 of 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.