Laserfiche WebLink
M4.mi J220-3240 Waicrt<ma RMd <br />JamuMry 14,2804 <br />PiftO <br />U MA*** Slarrwould suggest that as a former occupied dw elling site, and based <br />on the 1990 subdivision conclusions. Lot 2 should not be charged a park fee. <br />Lot 1 is being re-platted to make it buildable. Should Lot 1 be charged a park fee based on today ’s <br />^ Siormwafer and Drainafe Imorov^mfw^f^ <br />tolh lots dran dirally to a acek which How s to Stubbs Bay. From a water quality standpoint, they <br />B W«horc lots. There ,s little ability to collet s.gnific«,t amounts of stormw Ser ™off <br />from cither lot before it reaches the creek. <br />St^wuer tr»tm<mt provisions should be added to the plan in the form of required substantial <br />buffer stnps along the creek, w hich must remain vegetated with high grasses and not be feniliaed. <br />M with the park lee, there is some question as to s-helhcr this subdivision should be subject to the <br />Storm W ater and Drama^ Trunk Feeestablished byCily Ordinance. The fee is established at $2,700 <br />perKre.w,ihacapof4.0BTOtobechargedperloi Forlhispropeily.Lot I would be charged the <br />maximunt 4.0 acre fee (SI0.800) and Lot 2 would be charged for 3.47 acres (S9.369) How ever a <br />«'»“ “ » '“ble building site, and the real intent of the <br />i^tvis^istomakeLoi I buildable. An argument can be made that only the fee for Lot I shouldDC required. <br />EMtmtnlVMMip^qjPwljtalifln. The proposal includes vacation of existing Drainage and ftiliiics <br />EasemCTIs grants with the onpnalSennOrono Addition, with rededicationofnew easements alongnew lot lines, and new ly dewnbed wetland easements to match the new wetland delineation. Th! <br />subdivision is subject to dedication of standard Drainage & Utility Easements along lot lines. <br />Q Septic Testing and Sit^ <br />required 75’ setback from the OHWL and other required setbacks. <br />^ Other SkoeeiamJ Standafi^f <br />The »loi» n™ the south end of Ut I avenges 29V. at its steepest point, and theicfure is not <br />conside:edabluirT^renioval(6" diameter or greaterjwithin 73'of the creek isprohibited unlesspeimiB are^trt; tlw creek crossing may require tree removals w hich need to rev iew ed once <br />a plu u submitted. As previously noted, hardcover and other variances will be required for the