My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
01-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:15:37 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:06:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
520
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M4-2f71 J22t-324« Waitf1«ini RomI <br />iamury 14.2M4 <br />ri«t) <br />II/. OHWLarndFMMmlmmmi^ <br />The Zoning Code definn the OHWL fiw watercourses as “the elevation of the top of the bank of the <br />channeP. It also establishes the *Ttegulatoiy Flood Protection Elevation” (RFPE) as an elevation <br />no less than 1.0 foot above the 'regkmal nood ’. i.c. I’ above the IOO->ear Hoodplain ele\ation. <br />The Surface Water Management Plan indicates that the Normal Water Le\ el for the large wetland <br />basin just to the north of the properly is elevation 963.5*. with the High Water Level (100-year flood <br />level) at elevation 970.4*. The top of the bank of the channel at the constriction area in Ut I U at <br />approximate elevation 968.0*, and closely matches the delineated wetland boundary. In recent <br />discussions with the City Engineer, staff has concluded that the OH\\T for setback and lot area <br />calculation purpose for this property should be established at the wetland boundao elevation of <br />968*. The RFPE, i.e. the minimum floor elevation for anv building, should be established at <br />elevation 971.4*. <br />In proposed Lot I, it appears that neither the buildable area nor the septic sites will be impacted by <br />floodplain and OHWL elevations. However, the creek drivewav crossing will likely require fillinK <br />within floodplain as well as wetland. <br />IV. Front Lot/Eaek Lot <br />The original subdivision was created prior to the 1994 adoption of^front lolback lot ” standards <br />(Sections 78-1370 and 82-256). The existing lots aren’t subject to these special setback and area <br />requirements, but because new lots are being created, the subdivision will be subject to those <br />standards. The impacts include: <br />- Lot I M a b^k lot must meet a 3 acre minimum (it does); <br />• Lot I is subject to 150% of the standard setbacks (See staff sketch. Exhibit C2). <br />• Access to Lot 1 must be via a 30* driveway outlet (as proposed) <br />- Lot 2 is subject to a 50* side street setback from the drivewav outlot, r-.? er than a 30* side <br />setback. <br />Suminaiy of Regutotorv- Impacts <br />1.The 968 OHWL along the creek is the contour from which setbacks should be measured for <br />this property. The key OHWL setbacks that affect development of the site a'c* <br />• 100* structure setback from OHWL <br />- 75* septic setback from OHWX <br />- no hardcover allowed within 75* of OH\\X <br />Areas below* the OHWL will not count toward lot area calculations. <br />The lot diy/wei ueas and the OHWX Ktbacks as shoim by the sui\e>or appear to be <br />acceptable.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.