Laserfiche WebLink
- <br />Dsit AppIkaciM IUcthrt4: 12>17-43 <br />Datt AppUcattoa Caaaidcrcd aa CaoplMc: (l>«Nnpkte as af 1*1443) <br />120-Day Review Periad Etplret: 0%'UI aol Mart «Dtil complete appUcalioo received) <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners <br />Ron Moorse. City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Mike Gaf&on. Planning Director <br />January 14.2004 <br />404*2971 William & Roslyn Hcndcrson/Hickory Fine Homes, <br />3220*3240 Watertoun Road - Lot Line Re-Plat (Preliminary Subdivision) <br />Zoalag Dbtrkt: <br />Lot Area: <br />RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential, 2*acre min. <br />9.75 Acres (7.57 ac. dry, 2.18 ac. uetland^creckbcd) <br />ApplicatioH Summary: This is a proposed 2*lot residential re-plat of property located adjacent to <br />Stubbs Bay Creek. In August 1990, the City of Orono approved the plat of Orono Addition, <br />creating Lot 1 (3240 Watertov^n Road), Lot 2 and Outlot A (combined as 3220 Watertown Road). <br />The property contains protected wetlands and a protected tributary creek. The plat was approved <br />two years before adoption of Orono's Shoreland Ordinance (Zoning Code Section 10.56) and one <br />year prior to enactment of the Minnesota Wetland Conser\ ation Act (WCA). Both of these <br />subsequent regulations are applicable to the future development of the properties, and each has <br />significant impacts on their buildability. Neither lot has ever been built on. <br />As a result, applicants are proposing a complete lot line rearrangement to allow relocation of the <br />proposed driveway (which was never built and now would not be approved in its 1990 <br />conli::untion due to Shoreland restrictions) and to allow for slight revisions in potential house <br />local ons. The new plat is subject to ‘front lol/back lot’ area and setback standards which were <br />als(i not in effect in 1990. <br />The application is incomplete pending a grading plan and design for the driveway and creek <br />crossing, which requires a number of variances. It is staffs intent to review the variances and <br />subdivision concurrently, as they rely on each other for viability. <br />Staff Reeommtudatian: Briefly review, provide comments, then table pending receipt and <br />City Engineer review* of requested drivew ay and creek crossing plans. <br />List of Eihibits <br />A • Application <br />B • Existing Plat. Senn Orono Addition <br />C • Survey/site plan including staff sketch <br />D • Aerial photos <br />E * Wetland delineation excerpts <br />F * Septic systems information <br />G * Plat map <br />H • Property ow ners list <br />Information requested but not submitted as of 1/14*04: <br />- Grading plan and design for driveway and creek crossing