Laserfiche WebLink
FllE* 04-2987 <br />January 6.2004 <br />Paga4ef9 <br />Hardship Auhsismwm^m <br />^ ’“* *'*"•"""•"* -* <br />finds there is a hardship caused by the situation that resulted in the exisUng bam <br />being destroyed. Staff uill support a variance to allow an oversized accessory siiucture <br />exceeding the UOO s.f. by 300 s.f. to be constructed in the place of the old bam as the <br />destruction of the bam u-as neither the applicant’s intent nor an act of God. <br />Staff wodd make the following recommcndaiions in regards to the criteria for “undue <br />hardship" pertinent to this application; <br />1. “The property in question caiuwt be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls." <br />The property can be used, and an oversize structure can be conuructed under the <br />reasonable controls. In the opinion of staff this criterion is met <br />2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the landowner." <br />The existing barn was destroyed by afire which was ruled an arson. The applicant <br />did not cause the circumstances In the opinion of staff this criterion is met. <br />3. “The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." <br />The harn which was destroyed was 2.616 sf and existed for over 25 years in the <br />same location Replacing the old larger bam with a new bam 1.116 s f smaller will <br />not alter the c.usracter of the locality. In the opinion ofstaff this criterion is met <br />4. “Economic considerations alone shall rx>t constitute an undue hardship If <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br />The applicant has not indicated economics in the application In the opinion of staff <br />this criterion is met ' ^ <br />5. "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct <br />sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2 when in <br />harmony with this Chapter.” <br />AV/f <br />as a6. “The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council mav not permit _ <br />s yiancc any use that is not permined under this Chapter for pr^pem in the zone <br />where the affecied person's land is located " <br />K.4