My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:00:08 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 3:21:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
526
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 22, 2004 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Allan Engleman, 315 Old Crystal Bay Road North, once again addressed the City Council <br />regarding the conditions at 285 Old Crystal Bay Road North. He indicated that he had received a <br />letter from the C*ty in which the neighbor was asked to comply with City Ordinance by last night. <br />Engleman questioned whether the neighbor had complied with city standards and asked what <br />would happen next. <br />Moorse indicated that the neighbor had contacted the City and provided the City with <br />documentation that he is the owner of all 3 boats stored on the property. <br />Engleman asked about the other issues and pointed out that, according to a letter that he was given <br />by the City, since this owner was not the occupant of the residence he could not store all of those <br />boats on the property. He passed the letter around for staff and Council to review. <br />Gaffron indicated that this letter mistakenly misrepresented the fact that just the occupant could <br />store their boats in the site, when in fact the owner or occupant can do so. <br />Murphy questioned what would prohibit the owner from storing 15 boats on the property, as long <br />as he had the documentation that he owned them. <br />Gaffron stated that nothing would prohibit the owner from doing so. <br />As the compliance date had just passed, Curtis stated that she would visit the site the following day <br />to check out the progress. <br />Murphy stated that it seemed obvious to him that the neighbor was abusing the property and <br />creating an eyesore for the neighbors. Unfortunately, he admitted that there seemed to be few good <br />ways the City can deal with it. <br />ZONING AD>UNISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*4. #04-3047 BRUCE MEESE AND MAUREEN MURPHY, 3135 CASCO CIRCLE - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NOS. 5253 and 5254 <br />White moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt Resolution Nos. 5253 and 5254 granting renewal <br />variances for the property located at 3135 Casco Circle. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />5. #04-3052 ERIC VOCSTROM, 2618 CASCO POINT RO.JiD - VARIANCES <br />Curtis explained that the applicant is proposing 36.8®/o hardcover within the 75-250’ zone and an <br />average lakcshore seiback variance of 5’ rn conjunction with the redevelopment of the lot. She <br />pointed out that the Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend approval of a variance w ithin <br />the 75-250’ zone for 36.8% hardcover and an average lakeshorc setback variance to encroach 5’ in <br />conjunction w ith a landscape restoration plan to be approved. Although the Planning Commission <br />majonty felt the relatively small 75-250’ zone created a hardship for the property, Curtis stated that <br />staff IS not convinced that the level of 36.8% hardcover is warranted for this specific rebuild. <br />P.AGE 3 of 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.