My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:00:08 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 3:21:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
526
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mov. 5. ?004 12:33PM Anchor Bloch NSP UP <br />2004 11/05 11:23 PAX 0905863 INSTAWT TBSTING/Al.UED <br />No. 4055 P. 312002 q^Q <br />pmetrometer (DCP)« us«s • siuhit Xilogram (17.6 potmd) ha^cr to <br />driv* ■ 20 mllllmater diamelci: conioal point into the soil# with the <br />penetration recorded In mllllfAatars per blow. From the DCP <br />readings# a per blow, penatrotlon average was recorded and a N-value <br />derived. This N*-value# is ar empirical relationship we have <br />established to eguata the dyr.amlo cone data to the more iamiliar <br />blows per foot (BPP) etandarc. penetration soil boring test. <br />Dynamic Cona Penetrometer Test <br />DCP Depth per Blow P. vo. / H-V^^uo mated _h.g.a,d <br />556 (13.2”) 16.5 MM / N-21 7000 PSP <br />Exterior and interior observations of the residence indioatad no <br />apparent structural stress ba.sed on soil strength or elements of <br />the existing foundation or svpporting structural m^ers. While <br />some of the components# per plan 4/Xl oould be verified, many <br />details suoh as beam dimensicis and supporting piers could not be <br />fully addreoeed during this i-.«pection. Although the original (west <br />section) is expected to cerry less loading for the now construction, <br />some section.^ of the foundation may lack uniform capacity and the <br />etruotural components appear to be less substantial then those <br />observed within the newer eas: addition. We would therefore <br />anticipate the installation oC additional floor joists and supports, <br />as already recommended by the contractor. <br />In our opinion, based on the >xfocesventionad tast and observations, <br />the subgrade aolls below tho residence would he expected to moot or <br />exceed the loadbaaring ragulrements for the proposed construction. <br />Uo would however anticipate tlia addition of some etruotural <br />alaments, primarily within thi vast section of the residence, as <br />part of the naw oonatructlon. Also, we would recommend a review by a <br />structural engineer as part ot the overall construction plan. <br />Sinoarely, <br />Instant Tooting company <br />Gary SVandlsh <br />Senior Bnginaarint/Xnapector <br />CC: Perry (Fax: 652-473-3396) <br />#701 - 1 / 1605 - 2 / #306 (1) DCP / #612 - 53
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.