My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:00:08 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 3:21:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
526
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINlJTKvSOFTIIK <br />OUONO PLANNIN(; COMMISSION MKKTING <br />Monday, Octolicr 18, 2004 <br />6:00 o\dock p.iii. <br />garage. Vogstrom noted the cinicnt residence is also located on the property hne, which makes it <br />nonconfoiming, and the amount of hardcover on the lot is also being reduced with his proposal from <br />what cunently exists. <br />Winkcy inquired what impact a reduction to 25 percent haidcover would have on the design of the <br />house. <br />Vogstrom slated he is belter off going with the 1500 square fool footprint plus a small amount for a <br />diivewny and a sidewalk, which woiilil hung the liaidcovei to mound 30 pet cent. <br />1*1 ilzicr commented that m Ins view the sr/c of the lot should give the applicant an adequate buihling <br />pad and that he would be opposed to granting any variances, liitzlcr slated he would like to see the <br />haidcover icduccd to 25 percent. <br />Jurgens stated based on tlic time limits, he would like to make a nuitioii denying the application. <br />Jui geiiH iiioveil, I cslie seconded, to i econiiiieiid denial of Application .30S2, Fi le Vog^,t^oIn, <br />2618 Casco FoItU Road. <br />Kahn noted the applicant does have thr atnlity* to sign an agreement extending the OO days. <br />Hicmci staled .she docs not feel the IMaiining CoiiimiSsion should make a motion based solely on tlic <br />fact that the 60day tune liniil i.s alunil to expiic. <br />Jurgens stated ni Ins view the h.mli i>vei should be lolucnl to 25 priccnt and ih.at there is no need to <br />giaiil any variances based on tlic size of the building pad <br />VOTF.: Ayes S, Nays 2, Uiilin and Iti eniei opposed. <br />R.nlin st.iled he believes ibe ;i)>pbcant should be given the oppoitunity to revise his plans again but tliat <br />he is in agreement that the hardcover be reduced. <br />V\)gstn>m inquiicd whethci he could utilize an end loading g.nagr. <br />Jurgens statnl the applic.ant ilocs have that option but lliat a new application would need to Ik? <br />submitted. <br />r\c;F 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.