12-13-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

©c.p \DMJTES OF THE ORO.NO PLANNING COMNnSSION MEETLNG Monday, September 20,2004 6:00 o’clock p.ro. (##04-3051 Kc\in and Julie FitzpVrick, Continued) Guim^ch indicated people are allowM^ stairway to the lake. Jurgens ^Wted he also is persuaded some^t by the fact that this neighb^hood is gradually goi towards thetorger lots, which is changing tlVcharacter of the area. Fntzler stated ji^t because someone buys a lot lake, they should not be to sit on that lot for a period of tinw^ntil additional property can u^^cquired in order to create a lar^lot. Fritzler l^ated he would prS^t to see the residence a little biN|maUcr and a little bit lower jusWto reduce the abearance that it is a\a structure on a small lot, but tl^t he generally docs not have m>jh disVerecment with the pt^osal. KempWtatcd if a purchaser i^ot allowed to build a decentIS^e to live in on these small lots, removesictis type of lot from tm^iarket. Kempf stated he is i^^vor of the proposal. Leslie thai^d the neighbors for tliJkcomments on this proposal. Leslie nioved^cinpf seconded, to recS|jmcnd approval of a lot arc^ariance, lot width variance, - •• * - • vTIwanccs to Dcrmlt constructiolVf a'■‘••sidcncc located at Na^, Jurgens stated he is opposed to the approval because he docs not see a hardship for the variances. 8. «04-3052 ERIC VOGSTRO.M, 2618 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARI/^VNCE Eric Vogstrom, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a number of variances in order to construct a new single-family residence on the property. The variances being requested are a hardcover variance for 57.9 percent hardcover within the 75 ’-250’ setback zone where 25 percent is normally allowed; a variance for a side street setback of 10 feet where a 15-foot setback from the adjacent right-of-way is normally requited; and an average lakeshore setback variance to encroach 10’ nearer to the hike than the property to the south. Curtis stated the current home on the property is set back approximately 86 feet from the ordinary high water level, with the applicant’s proposal showing a 75-foot setback. Curtis indicated the view of the hake from the property to the south should not be impacted by the applicant’s proposal. Curtis stated bordering the applicant’s property to the north is an undeveloped public nght-of-way. The applicant’s property is approximately 80 feet in width Allowing for a 10-foot setback on the south and a 15-foot side street setback on the north leaves a 55-foot wide buildable area. It is Staffs opinion a reasonable home can be constructed w'lthm this area. The applicant is proposing 57.9 percent hardcover for t’ms lot, with a 3,002 square foot footprint to essentially max out the 15 percent structural coverage amount based on the total dry land area. The total property area is 20,561 square feet; however, this includes approximately 4,000 square feet separated PAGE 20