Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #04.3052 <br />October U. 2004 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Background ^ <br />This application was before the Planning Commission at the September 20 meeting and <br />was tabled in order for the applicant to redesign and reduce hardcover. Since that time <br />the applicant has met with staff and redesigned the proposal in an attempt to further <br />reduce hardcover. Additionally, the applicant has proceeded with tree removal in <br />preparation for redevelopment of the property. The applicant perfonned this work <br />without City approval or permits. The City is now in the process of analyzing the <br />number of trees lost and an appropriate restoration plan. Staff recommends any variance <br />approval include implementation of a Council approved restoration plan. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />l.ot ArcaAVt Uh; <br />LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21,780 s.f. ('/racrc)100’ <br />Actual 20,561 s.f. (0.47 acre)100’ @ shoreline <br />80’ @ 75 ’ selback <br />Setbacks: <br />LR-IC Required Existing Proposed (Revised) <br />Lakeshore 75 ’ <br />80’ (home) <br />78’(deck) <br />Rear 30’30’ <br />North Street Side 15’10’ <br />South Side 10’13.2’ <br />Average Lakeshore The home on property to the south is set back 86’± from the OHWL; the <br />applicant ’s proposal shows a 75 ’ setback. Technically, the applicant <br />needs an average lakeshore setback variance however; lake views from <br />the property to the south will not be impacted by the applicant’s <br />proposal. ____ <br />Structural Coverage: <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />20.561 s.f. (0.47 acre) <br />Approximulfly 16,400 s f not incltHlinj; <br />the portions of the property to the luist of <br />Carman liav <br />Allowed: 3,084 s.f. (15%) <br />Proposed: 3,002 s.f. (14.6 %) <br />Adjusted Allosved: 2,460 s.f. = 15% of 16,400 s.f.