My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
12-13-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:00:08 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 3:21:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
526
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 08-18-04 <br />Date Application Complete: 09-13-04 <br />120-Day Review Period Extended: 03-10-05 <br />p«rcTiMr: <br />DEC 1 i 2004 <br />CITY UK CHUiYO <br />REC^LIEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: December 7, 2004 <br />_______ Item No. ^ f <br />Department Approval: . <br />Name: Melanie Curtis 11|^^\ <br />Title: City Plaoner <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Item Description: <br />#04-3052 - Eric Vogstrom 2618 Casco Point Road - Variances <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />List of Exhibits: <br />LR-IC. One Family Lakeshore Residential, 0.5 acre/100’ <br />0.47 acie/20.56l s.f. <br />100' parallel to the shore &. 80’ (g! 75’ setback <br />A - Revised Plans 12-05-04 <br />B - Council Action Notice 12 02-04 <br />C - Council Memo 11-17-04 <br />D - Review Period Extension 12-01-04 <br />E - Restoration Plan Staff Review Letter 12-08-04 <br />Application Summary: <br />This application was tabled at yova November 22"' meeting in order to provide the applicant with an <br />opportunity to redesign die proposal to reduce or eliminate the variances requested. At that time <br />Council directed the applicant to redesign the proposal to include a 1,500 s.l. building tootprint and the <br />appropriate hardcover to support that home. Upon receipt of this requested plan the Council would <br />determine the appropriate Uvel of hardcover variance. <br />1 he applicant has submiiterl a rei ised plan: the home was slightly redesigned and the applicant is now <br />proposing a slightly lesser variance than the 36.8% hardcover within the 75 -250 setback /.one which <br />was proposed previously. Hie new design is reduced from 1.884 s.f. to a 1,699 s.t. building footprint <br />(including a home, 3-car aiiached garage, aiui deck) with a total of 36.0% hardcover in the 75 -250 <br />zone. 1 he new design proposes only a 0.8% hardcover reduc.ion trom the previous proposal. Staff <br />feels that the proposal is not responsive to the Council ’s direction, and is resulting in excessive staff <br />lime being spent on the application. <br />Planning Commission Reeommciulalion <br />On November 15. 2004, IMaimmg Commission voted 5-2 (dissenting Commissioners Fritzlcr and <br />Jurgens felt ailditional hardcover reductions were warranted) to reconunend approval of a variance <br />within the 75’-250’ zone for Jo.SSo hardcover or 2,824 s.f. and an average lake setback variance to <br />encroach 5’ into the average lake setback in conjunction with landscape restoration plan to be <br />approved. Hie I’Urnning Commission has not reviewed the m.vst recent submittal.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.