Laserfiche WebLink
r f <br />\ i <br />«3052 - ADDENDUM <br />To:Ron Moorsc, City Administrator <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Melanie Curtis, City Planner <br />litrcTiMr: <br />OEC 1 ,5 2004 <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Mike Galfron, Planning Dircctor^^/^^^^ <br />December 10,2004 <br />CilYu-oiiu\y <br />Subject: //3052, liric Vogstrom, 2918 Casco Point Road <br />Attacluncnts: <br />1 - Revised sui'vcy submitted 12-11-04 and full-size excerpt <br />2 - Revised hardcover calculations submitted 12-11-04 <br />3 - Resolution No. 5179 <br />At 11:00 a.m. today Mr. Vogstrom submitted a revised suiA'cy ami banlcovcr worksheet, showing changes <br />to the driveway resulting in a pro|K).sed 75-250' hardcover level of 34.5%. f his infonnation was received <br />after the staff tnemo and packet were already complete and copied. <br />TIjc plan revision that resulted in this decre;Lse from 36.0% to 34.5% is a reduction of 114s. f oftiriveway. <br />While this is a commendable attempt at hardcover reduction, it suddenly puts thedriveway proposal out <br />ofcompliance with the minimum drivewaystandanls of Resolution No. 5179, "A Resolution i*.stablishing <br />Policies Regarding Minimum 1 lardcover Standards for Garages. Driveways, Sidewalks, and Similar <br />Properly Features ” adopted 5-24-04. <br />Resolution No. 5 179 requires a minimum apron width of 28’ for a tlircc stall garage and a minitnum apron <br />depth of 15' prior to the apron beginning to tape*". The previous proposal met the rnininunn 15' apron <br />depth. The new proposal only has a 10 ’ apri>n depth before the taper. <br />I hc policy Resolution establishing minimum driveway standards was adopted for the exact pui poseof <br />avoiding situations such as that now proposed, which results in inadequate area for vehicle parking and <br />maneuvering. The Council should reject this utfeiiipt at hardcover reduction us not being in <br />compliance with minimum driveway standards.