My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:39:26 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:21:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINT’TES OF THE <br />ORONO CIT'jf COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 8,2004 <br />7:00‘o’clock p.m. <br />Ritter inquired whether the Council would allow a paver called Ncco-Paver. Ritter noted this type of <br />paver allows pciTneation of water through it. Ritter stated they would like to utilize these pavers for the <br />walkways and that they would be willing to remove the dog kennel. <br />Curtis stated removal of the dog kennel would bring the property back to the approved level in 2004. <br />Ritter inquired why the dog kennel was not included in the original calculations. <br />Curtis indicated it was not included on tlie survey. Curtis noted she did not perform a total site review at <br />the time she visited the property. <br />McMillan inquired whether the dog kennel is cuaently being used. <br />Ritter stated it is not. <br />White inquired whether the owner plans to have dogs there in the future. <br />• • <br />Ritter stated she does not. Ritter noted the house was constructed in the 1930’s. <br />• • <br />Sansevere inquired whether the City would pennit those type of pavers. <br />Gaffron stated the paver would still be considered as hardcover, noting the Planning Commission has had <br />a number of discussions over the years concerning that type of paver. Gaffron stated the City does <br />encourage property owners to utilize that type of paver, but at the present time still considers them <br />hardcover. <br />Ritter noted Deep Haven, Tonka Bay and Minnetonka Beach currently allow them. <br />Sansevere commented the standards are higher in Orono. <br />White stated in his opinion the City should look at reconsidering whether they are included as hardcover. <br />Sansevere stated incorporating that t>'pc of paver and not having them be considered hardcover is not an <br />option at the present time. <br />Peterson inquired whether the applicant has any other alternatives she would like to present. <br />Ritter stated the applicant has a 150-foot setback, which basically goes to the front yard. <br />UitllkHliMMiiai
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.