Laserfiche WebLink
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota hereby denies the requested variances as described above based on one or <br />more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The property consists of 2.2 acres, or 95,002 s.f. in land area. <br />Variances were granted in 2004 (Resolution Number 5206) on this <br />property to permit construction of decks over existing concrete patios <br />consisting of hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback of 7.8% or 1,532 s.f.. <br />The house was constructed prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Overlay <br />District standards classifying French Lake as a Natural Environment lake <br />requiring a 150’ structure setback. <br />It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to protect the <br />water quality of French Lake by limiting the amount of hardcover a lot <br />contains. No hardship exists on this lot that would require additional <br />hardcover. <br />The granting of the requested variances would be contrary to the <br />provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-123, Subdivision A with <br />which the applicant must first comply in order that variance be granted. <br />The Council finds that: <br />a. The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />b. The variance, if granted, will alter the essential character of the <br />locality. <br />c. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are <br />not peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. <br />d. The conditions do apply generally to other land or structures in the <br />district in which the land is located. <br />e. The granting of the application is not necessary for the preserv’ation <br />and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. <br />Page 2 of 3