My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 20, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(S04-3052 Eric Vogstrotn, Continued) <br />Barbara Essen, 264S Casco Point Road, stated they have spoken with the applicant regarding the issue <br />of drainage and that the applicant has indicated he is more than willing to ensure that drainage from this <br />lot will not affect their lot. <br />Jeff Essen stated the first plan did not show a swale, with the recent plan showing a swale. Essen stated <br />the applicant has also indicated he would be installing gutters and do\%Tispouts, which would also help to <br />alleviate their concerns regarding runoff. <br />Barbara Essen stated they are not opposed to the larger driveway since parking along Casco Point Road <br />is a problem at times. Essen indicated the applicant has also expressed a willingness to preser\'c the <br />nicer trees on this lot, noting that a number of larger trees were lost as a result of a storm in 1997. <br />Vogstrom stated the preservation of the trees is also one reason why he would like to have approval of <br />the 10-foot encroachnicnt into the right-of-way. Vogstrom slated the majonty of the trees ate located on <br />the south side of the lot. <br />Alan Greene, 2645 Casco Point Road, stated he is located across the street from this lot. and that in his <br />opinion the proposed hardcover for this lot is excessive. Greene stated his residence is approximately <br />1200 square feet on a lot that is approximately the same size and that the lot in question is being <br />overbuilt. <br />Vogstrom stated Greene’s footprint is 1374 square feet and his garage is 695, for a total footpnnt of <br />over 2,000 square feet. <br />Fritzlcr stated he does not see the need for the 57.9 percent where 25 percent is allowed and 26 4 <br />percent currently exists. Fritzler stated he docs not see the hardship for the increase in the hardcover <br />Fritzlcr stated he is also opposed to the 10-foot setback. <br />Bremer inquired what number Fritzler would like to see for this lot given its restrictions. <br />Fritzlcr stated he would be willing to approve 27 percent hardcover for this lot, but that he docs not sec <br />any justification for the additional hardcover or encroachment. <br />Ken.pf stated he is in agreement with Fritzlcr and that the plan appears to have beer, laid out without <br />any consideration for the hardcover restrictions. Kempf mquircd \\ nether the applicant would be addmg <br />a deck or patio in the future. <br />Vogstrom .stated a deck is included in his current plans and that he docs not intend to add a patio in the <br />future. <br />Bremer indicated she feds the 27 percent is low given the restrictions of this lot. <br />Rahn commented he also feds this is a hardshap lot but that it does not justify the 57.9 percent <br />hardcover being proposed. Rahn stated in his view more cfTort needs to be made to reduce the <br />hardcover and that the strucrure could also be reduced to eliminate the need tor t.he side sU'cet setback <br />variance. <br />PAGE 22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.