My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 <br />(#2461 Chris Pierson, continued) <br />on one lot. <br />Weinbe^er stated this proposed lot line rearrangement would reduce density on Big Island and the <br />eventu j removal of structure and hardcover and returning the area more to its natural appearance. <br />mHwall* X A?n*^** ” 2“^^^ 22 ® ® shares a well located to the south, which would be <br />P[0P®*^y should the lot line rearrangement be approved, and also shares a septic <br />T ®PP^''®' 0^ '0‘ "ne rearrangement to create the two tax parcels vrith <br />n?nfl«rtl!In^2^if«hlf!!2l2 parcel, and Lots 6, 7, and 8 making up the other parcel, f 'ff is <br />*®®®*®** ® P® removed, along with the deck, stainvay. sic - 'aiK, and <br />remo\«l of the shed, prior to the filing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. Staff is ais j <br />requesting that title opinions be delivered to the City for Lots 3 through 8. <br />was acquired from Betty Fisher who had requested at the time of <br />to by Bryson Vnd J?h^^ ® sentimental reasons, which was agreed <br />Chair Smith inquired what the use of the cabin will be should it remain on the property. <br />K?e"e ye^'^^ intentions on utilizing the cabin and are veiling to remove it In two <br />P?rrni2n?2l2Sl;.L22*2i “®,w ''•^® **’® ‘P® five years, but if thePlanning Commission decided otherwise, they would be willing to remove the cabin. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Lhidquist Indicated he would be agreeable to allowing the cabin to remain on the property for two <br />Smith commented that the only issue with this application appears to be the cabin. <br />not beremoved concerns regarding enforcement should the cabin <br />Lindquist commented a bond could be required at a reasonable cost. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to allow the cabin to remain for two and a half <br />Page 8 <br />ieMUiiililiaHfaiMlMlM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.