My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT G <br />M04-3010 <br />August 16,2004 <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />Date Application Received: 4-21-04 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 6-9-04 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 8-8-04 extended to 10-7-04 <br />To:Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: Janice Gundlach, City Planner <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />August 12,2004 <br />#04-3010, Theodore L. Capra, 3534 Ivy Place <br />- Hardcover Variance, Conditional Use Permit <br />- Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR- 1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential District ('/i acre min.) <br />0.50 acres (21,926 s.'f.) <br />104 feet @ Shoreline; 101 feet @75’ Setback <br />Application Siunmaiy; Applicant requests the following in ordci to construct a new <br />residence on an existing lot: <br />1. Hardcover variance to permit 30% hardcover within the 75’-250' zone where <br />25% is nonnally allowed and 49% currently exists. <br />2. Conditional use permit to allow land alterations within the 0-75’ zone <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the hardcover variance as the <br />project is a rebuild and should be held to the 25% hardcover limitation and no valid <br />hardship has been demonstrated. Staff also recommends denial of the conditional use <br />permit to allow grading within 75’ of the lake. Only one portion of the slope requires <br />restoration, which can be accomplished w'ithout grading the entire lake yard or <br />constiaicting any retaining walls. The applicant is encouraged to investigate the use of <br />deep-rooted plant material like prairie grasses and/or wildflowers, other than turf grass, in <br />an effort to stabilize the existing slope. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Revised Survey <br />Exhibit B - Revised Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit C - Revised Elevations <br />Exhibit D - Revised Floor Plans <br />Exhibit E - Photographs <br />Exhibit F - 60-Day Extension Letter <br />Exhibit G - PC Meeting Minutes of 6-21 -04 <br />Exhibit H — PC Action Notice of 6-22-04 <br />Exhibit 1 - PC Report of 6-17-04 <br />Background <br />The applicant and the applicant’s architect have met with staff numerous times since the <br />June Planning Commission meeting to discuss alternative site plans in an attempt to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.