Laserfiche WebLink
Date of Preliminary Plat Approval: January 12,2004 <br />Date Preliminary Plat Approval Expires: January 12,2005 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />NOV S 200^ <br />ClIV OH OHONO <br />Date: November 5, 2004 <br />Item No.: <br />Department Approval:Administrator Approval: <br />Name. Michael P. Gaffron <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Title: Plamiing Director <br />I <br />Item Description: #03*2961 Nina Wildman, 745 Spring Hill Road <br />- Final Plat Approval: “Spring Hill Estates ” - Resolution <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Resolution <br />B - Final Plat Drawing <br />C - Revised Survey Showing Changes from Preliminary Plat <br />D - Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution No. 5099 <br />E - Punch-List Letter to Applicant September 9,2004 <br />The applicant has completed (or will complete prior to release of the plat for filing) all requirements of <br />preliminary plat approval as defined in Resolution No. 5099 adopted January 12,2004. The name of the <br />plat is “SPRING HILL ESTATES”. <br />The plat results in the creation of two buildable lots (Lots 2 and 3) in addition to the pre-existing building <br />site (Lot 1), and two access outlets, one for a private road loop subject to an underlying City road <br />easement, and one for a private driveway to serve Lots 2 and 3 . Applicant will shortly begin construction <br />of a new residence on Lot 2, and she is selling Lot 3 to tlie adjoining property owners, the Winston’s, who <br />have no immediate plans for use of Lot 3 except as open space. <br />The loop road Outlot has been revised in shape slightly to save a number of mature Uecs and to allow for <br />a ‘straight-tlu'ough ’ driveway to serve Lot 2. The applicant is requesting, and staff is supporting, defeiral <br />of the actual construction of the loop road until furtlier development occurs (i.e. perhaps until Lot 3 is built <br />on or until eitherof Lots 2 or 3 are llirther subdivided). Staff, including City EngincerTom Kellogg and Fire <br />Marshal Bill Meyer met with the applicant and her consultants to discuss this request, and the conclusion <br />was that the proposed expansion of the readjust before the cul-de-sac, where it splits off to serv c the Lot <br />I and the Winton property, will provide adequate emergency and large vehicle access and tum-around <br />capability. Additionally, the applicant has agieed to provide hvo ‘bump-outs’ in her 1500' long driveway <br />where, for instance, fire tioicks could turn out to allow incoming vehicles to pass outgoing vehicles. A <br />satisfactory design for this has been provided. <br />The only remaining issue, then, is what will trigger construction of the complete loop • a new home <br />on Lot 3, or further subdivision of either Lots 2 or 3. Staff would prefer the former, but would be <br />comfortable with the latter as long as construction of a house on Lot 3 includes a satisfactory <br />driveway loop near the house.