My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MLNTJTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 18,2004 <br />6:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />‘ ' . r O <br />Jolmscm stated the berm has been constructed, with the existing trees between the highway and the <br />parking lot being preserved. Johnson stated a five-foot high opaque fence has also been added. <br />Rahn inquired whether the change in lighting is being driven by the insurance company. <br />Johnson stated it is driven by the concern for the property that will remain in the lot all night and the <br />personnel that will be on the site. <br />Bremer suggested the list of items outlined on page three be gone through by the applicant. <br />Jolinson stated he is confident he can obtain a letter from the insurance agent that would basically say <br />the htsurance company would like lighting in the parking lot to preserve the value of the property and <br />to protect ihe personnel coming in and out. Johnson stated they have submitted infonnation <br />concerning the style and shielding of the type of light being proposed, which was approved with 25 ’ <br />posts two years ago. <br />Johnson stated an analysis of the lighting options was conducted, with a study of the 1000-watt being <br />submitted to Staff. Johnson stated they did not submit the study on the 400-watt lighting but that he <br />does have that information available. <br />Bremer inquired whether any lighting on the building is being proposed. <br />Johnson stated the only lighting on the building that they are proposing is what cun ently exists on the <br />building, which essentially lights the side of the building and is downcast. <br />Fritzlcr inquired whether any security people could be brought onto the site. <br />Jolurson stated the primary security is the fact that it is a well-lit lot. Johnson stated there would be <br />employees on the site who will also keep on eye on the property. <br />Fritzler noted the front driveway is secure. <br />Johnson stated the front driveway has a gate that closes across the front of the entrance. <br />Fritzler inquired whether there would be employees on site at 2:00 a.m. <br />Johnson stated the potential exists that no one would be on site in the early morning hours and also the <br />potential that truck drivers would be on the lot in the early morning hours. <br />PAGE 40 <br />vam <br />• I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.