My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: November 4, 2004 <br />Item No.: J) <br />Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: » ,ctrTirgG <br />82004 <br />Item Description: #2461 William and Thelma Bryson & James A. R. Johnson O hono <br />650-660-670-680 Big Island <br />- Subdivi:,ion of a Lot Line Rean angement <br />- Extension of Effective Period of Approval <br />Zoning District: RS - Recreational Seasonal District <br />List of Exhibits <br />A Extension Resolution <br />B Letterof Request 10-26-04 <br />C Memo and Exhibits of March 28, 2002 <br />Application Summary: Applicants request extension of the lot line rearrangement approval granted <br />April 22,2002, which expired in April 2003. The approval allowed 4 ‘Record Lots’ on Big Island to <br />be divided and combined to result in just 2 final lots. <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of an extension of the effective period of <br />subdivision approval to April 22, 2005. <br />Please review the exhibits. Tire reason for the requested extension is that the subdivision was never filed <br />with the County, because the applicants encountered title issues which have only recently been resolved <br />(See Exhibit B). Our standard boilerplate language required that tltis subdivision be filed with the County <br />by October 22,2002. This application was seen by staff as a win-w in for the applicants and the City, as <br />it results in new lots that :ire more confonning in size than the prior layout. The City Attorney has indicated <br />that while no hearing is required to extend the approval, formal Council action is necessary. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of an extension of the effective period of subdivision approval to April 22, <br />2005 per the attached resolution. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Adopt or amend the attached resolution.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.