Laserfiche WebLink
3. <br />4. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on October 18, 2004 and recommended approval of variances based <br />on the following findings: <br />a. The property has 10,000 s.f. (0.23 acre) in area and 50’ in width. <br />b. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applicants to <br />make the property conforming in area or width. <br />c. The property is served with municipal sewer. A single family <br />residence has existed on the property for many years. <br />d.Because the property is 10,000 s.f. in area it is allowed a 1,500 s.f. <br />structural footprint absent other factors. Construction of a 1,350 s.f <br />home and driveway account for 36 % of hardcover within the 75 ’-250’ <br />setback zone. <br />e. Tlie applicant has proposed a home that meets all setback and <br />structural coverage requirements. <br />f The applicant has proposed a home which straddles the line between <br />the 75 ’-250’ setback zone and the 250’-500’ zone and proposed <br />minimal driveway in order to limit the magnitude of the hardcover <br />excesses. <br />g. The proposal will not have a negative impact on light, air or open <br />space within the neighborhood. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation cf the Planning Commission, reports by City staff <br />comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />f <br />I