Laserfiche WebLink
April 19. 2004 <br />TO; CityofOrcno (the city) <br />FROM; Harold and Mildred (Middy) Bower <br />68 Copperhead Cove Trail <br />Old Fort, NC 28762 <br />(828) 724-4643 <br />SUBJECT; 1925 Lake view Terrace (the parcel, the lot) <br />BACKGROUND; We purchased this parcel of land in 1974 as a “buffer” between our <br />property at 1080 North Brown Road and the neighbors to the east of us It was a <br />residential one acre lot as are all of the lots in the Long Lake Country Club Addition. <br />Apparently in 1975, an aerial photo was taken and this lot was labeled a “wetland” <br />without any scientific surface studies being conducted to show the limited area of the <br />wetland. Please note that in the accompanying Plat of this addition, approved by the <br />Orono Planning Commission and Village Council of Orono in August 1961, it states that <br />there are no wet lands in the plat except as designated (none are designated within the <br />boundaries of this parcel. Lot 2 Block 2), (granted that the definitions of wetlands may <br />have been changed since this date in 1961 .) Also the Protective Covenants for this area <br />(Torrens Title Exhibit “A" Doc. No. 669783), enclosed, states in paragraph A that “All <br />lots ... shall be known and described as residential lots ’’ Please note that we were never <br />notified of the “wetland" label for this property. <br />In late 2002, it became apparent that we would be moving from Orono due to Middy’s <br />employment relocation. When we contacted the city for clarification of the status of this <br />lot, wc were then informed of the “wetland” label attached to it and told that a wetland <br />delineation procedure must be obtained to show the extent of the wetland area if it did not <br />encompass the entire lot. We had this study conducted by a licensed organization. <br />Aquatic EcoSolutions, Inc. in November 2002, (results enclosed). In February, 2004 we <br />had the lot resurveyed to show the boundaries of the wetland delineation (survey <br />enclosed). As of this date we have entered into a purchase agreement to sell the property <br />to a developer who is familiar with the necessary follow-up procedures that need to be <br />completed in order to construct a residence on this lot. A part of this agreement is that <br />the developer will, at their cost, pay for sanitary sewer assessments and any <br />improvements that are necessary to ensure that a suitable foundation for a residence be <br />constructed. Please note that a rough measurement of the “non-wetland" area of the lot <br />reveals that a residence of suitable size to conform to the limits imposed by the <br />aforementioned Protective Covenants and to conform to the general aesthetics of the <br />surrounding homes can be constructed in confoimance to existing wetland and lot-lme <br />setback limitations WITHOUT any variances. <br />THE SITUATION AND REQUEST; We are now in possession of a purchase agreement <br />for the lot that is labeled a “w'etland" and that is the same size as others in this addition <br />but is now nonconforming to the standards of the city (2 acre minimum). We therefore <br />request that the city EXPEDITIOUSLY honor our request for a variance to the lot size <br />o n <br />f“:.) <br />J