My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
10-25-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 2:05:31 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 1:30:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT B <br />Hardship Documentation <br />1. “Tlie property in question can not be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the of^cial controls” <br />N/A <br />2. “Tlie plight of the landowner is due to circumstauces unique to his property not created by the <br />landowner.” <br />The existing home was constructed witliin 75* of the lakeshore prior to the adoption of <br />the 1975 hardcover ordinance that introduced the 75’ setback from the lake shore. The <br />master suite currently does not meet the natural light requirement of S% glazing of the <br />room’s square footage. In addition, the existing space does not meet the 4% natural <br />ventilation requirement. The natural ventilation requirement also requires the windows to <br />be ‘readily controllable,’ which the existing window does not satisfy these conditions due <br />to it being located behind the tub. The proposed will meet and exceed all of these <br />requirements. <br />3. ‘‘Tlie variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” <br />The character will be enhanced by creating a more aesthetically pleasing and balanced <br />structure from the lake view. Even though an increase will be made to the square footage <br />of the elevation, the increase will only be a total of 2.1%. This will not increase the <br />overall height of the structure. The new dormer will rcmaui within the height of the <br />existing structure therefore the profile will not increase in size from the elevation view. <br />4. “Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for <br />the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.” <br />Economics do not play a role. The change in question would cost more than it would to <br />keep the existing condition. <br />5. “Undo hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined <br />in Minnesota Statutes, Sectionl 16J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with tliis chapter.” <br />The master suite currently does not meet the natural light requirement of 8% glazing of <br />the room’s square footage. The proposed will meet this requirement. <br />6. “The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not pennit as a variance any use <br />that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person’s <br />land is located.” <br />N/A <br />7. “The Board of Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-famiiy dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling.” <br />N/A <br />& ') k hcijC r. i'i V ; <br />I of 2 <br />L
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.