My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
10-25-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 2:05:31 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 1:30:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r . • <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Jeff Gori, Morton Buildings, noted that there is a vegetation buffer on three sides of the building and <br />that it would be more aesthetically pleasing to have one building rather than multiple buildings. <br />Rahn inquired what the purpose is for having 12-foot sidewalls. <br />Gori stated with 12-foot sidewalls, the overhead door would be 10 feet, noting that on a residential <br />home the overhead door is seven or eight feet. Gori indicated the taller sidewalls would accommodate a <br />larger item. <br />Rahn stated he still has a concern regarding the size of the stmeture, and that if t\vo buildings were <br />constructed, the need for the variances 'vould be clui.-n^' id. <br />Leslie staled in his view two smaller buildings would be more attractive rather than one large industrial <br />looking structure. Leslie noted that the appearance of something also tends to be in the eye of the <br />beholder and can vary from person to person. <br />Rahn stated the Planning Commission has to grant variances based on a hardship, which has not been <br />demonstiatcd. <br />Leslie stated even if the alternate septic site cannot be swapped with the structure, a number of the <br />Planning Commission members have a concern regarding the size of the building. Leslie stated the <br />viability of the alternate septic site should be detennined before a final decision is made. <br />Rahn indicated the applicant has the option of tabling his application until the results come back on his <br />alternate septic site or have the Plaruiing Commission vote on each of the variances. Rahn inquired <br />what the setbacks would be if the building were reduced to 1200 square feet. <br />Gundlach indicated any accessory structure over 1000 feet has to meet principal structure setbacks. <br />Leslie noted the setback would be 15 feet if the stiucturc were reduced to 1000 square feet <br />Jurgens indicated he would be willing to make a motion approving the variance to permit the proposed <br />storage shed to be located nearer the front but denying the variance for the north side yard setback and <br />the oversized accessory structure area ^•ariancc. <br />PAGE 17 <br />iteuiilikaiBdi <br />• li
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.