My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
10-11-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 1:35:22 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 1:30:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IVTTNXJTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 20, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />building location can be swapped. If they can be swapped, the setback variances should be denied. If <br />the bvo cannot be swapped, a variance to allow an accessory structure to be located in front of the house <br />should be granted based on the power easement, wetland, and septic constraints. <br />Gundlach stated if a setback variance is gr anted. Staff would recommend denial of the building area <br />variance and recommend that the applicant be held to the 1,200 square foot limitation. If the Planning <br />Commission wishes to grant a building area variance based on the remote nature of the lot. Staff <br />recommends that the building meet all setback requirements. <br />Persian indicated one of the reasons for the pt wposed size of the structure is to limit having multiple <br />buildings on the property. Persian staled they would prefer to have just one single structure on the <br />property to serve their needs rather than multiple buildings and would be more aesthetically pleasing to <br />the neighborhood, bi addition, the lot is so secluded that the structure would nut be seen but also the <br />home cannot be seen for about a third of a mile. <br />Persian stated as far as the structure being proposed in front of the house, technically that is true but <br />what is in between his residence and the house that is to the southeast of them is about a 75’ swath of <br />trees, which makes it impossible to see their house or the neighbor’s house. <br />Rahn inquired what the primary use would be for a building that size. <br />Persian stated they would like to store personal items in there, noting at the present time he has two <br />trailers sitting outside, personal ATV’s in the garage, and other items sitting in the yard. Persian <br />indicated he would like to have all those items stored inside. <br />Ralin commented a number of residents within the City have the same type of items, and noted that the <br />proposed structure is the size of four, four-car garages. Rahn inquired what the sidewall height is for <br />this building. <br />Persian stated the sidewalls are 12 feet. <br />Rahn inquired whether the slope of the roof would be 4-12, which would make the peak of the roof 18 <br />feet and the median height 15 feet. <br />PAGE 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.