My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
10-11-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 1:35:22 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 1:30:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 27, 2004 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />(2. Fire Rescue Vehicle Purchc*, - Navarre, Continued) <br />Sansevere moved, Murphy seconded, to accept the bid for the rescue vehicle, with the <br />addition of the light tower, in the amount of $139,781, reflecting the $3,250 discount for the <br />90% prepayment; to be funded $30,781 from the Navarre Fire Station Construction Fund, <br />and $109,000 from the Fire Equipment Replacement Account of the Improvement and <br />Equipment Outlay Fund, and to amend the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund <br />budget to reflect the expenditure. <br />Since safety is a high priority among the Orono City Council, Sansevere questioned whether staff <br />could accept the additional expenditure for the light tower. <br />While he was unsure whether the funds for the expenditure were available, Moorsc stated that he <br />felt the City could cover the additional S4,0Q0 expenditure. <br />VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />The Long Lake Fire Chief commented that hopefully the Second Call donation Fund might be able <br />to fund some of the additional items. <br />2A. Highway 12 Turnback Consultant Scope of Work and Contract <br />Moorse reported that the joint Long Lake/Orono Highway 12 Turnback Committee has been <br />meeting to identify the key issues related to the turnback of current Highway 12 from the State to <br />the County when the Highway 12 project is complete. This turnback provides a unique opportunity <br />to rethink the function and design of this roadway to match the types of land use envisioned along <br />Highway 12. <br />Moorse indicated that the next steps will be to translate the vision, obtained from open meetings, <br />into a roadway design, and an aesthetic (landscape/streetscape) design, and to w ork to obtain <br />County approval of the design. Moorse explained that the committee had interviewed three <br />enginecnng consultants to provide the necessary expertise, and settled on WSB. along with <br />Hoisington Kocgler, to provide engineering and technical assistance. <br />While the total cost for the consultant w'ork is $79,430, Moorsc stated that Orono and Long Lake <br />will share the costs of the consultant equally. <br />Murphy complimented both Long Lake and Orono members of the committee w'ho have spent long <br />hours looking at this process and determined that it is clear they need help w ith the next phases of <br />the project. <br />Tony Cleveland, Long Lake City Council member, stated that the committee members were not <br />experts on designing and developing the roadway and recognized the need to find an engineering <br />firm to assist them. <br />Randy Gilbert, Long Lake City Council member, commended the process, noting that the <br />committee has been ahead of the curve to date and must stav the cour.se. <br />PAGE 2 of J 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.