My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
09-27-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 1:22:12 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 1:14:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M2-2S50 <br />September 20,2004 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />Sec. 78-766. Area, height, lot width, setback requirement and design requirements. <br />(i) Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2'/j stories ©f and shall not <br />exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. <br />Sec. 78-797. Area, height, lot width setback requirements and design requirements. <br />(7) No structure or building shall exceed 2'/i stories or and shall not exceed 30 <br />feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. <br />Sec. 78-825. Area, height, setback and design requirements. <br />(d) Height. No structure or building shall exceed three stories of and shall not <br />exceed 40 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Docs the Planning Commission have any issues with the proposed amendments and <br />their impacts on development? <br />2. Is the Planning commission interested in establishing a peak height maximum of 40 <br />feet, to be included in a future amendment? <br />3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Recommend the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to Sections 78-1, 230 (a), <br />255 (a), 305 (a), 330 (a), 350 (a), 370 (a), 395 (a), 420 (a), 44 (a), 502, 572, 646 (i), 672 <br />(a), 707 (n), 736 (i), 766 (i), 797 (7), 825 (d) to clarify for the public how building height <br />is determined. <br />Staff would also reconunend that the Planning Commission continue to discuss the <br />building height issue at work sessions in an attempt to possibly adopt a maximum peak <br />height as well as additional height restrictions on substandard width lots.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.