My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
09-27-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 1:22:12 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 1:14:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT L 2. <br />Iniprovcments to the lot: With the counsel of Tanicc and Tom, we have come to understand <br />the rationale and support the cities development philosophy. Our submittal and intent <br />deinonstiales our commitment to improving this propert)* and protecting the lake consistent <br />with Orono’s vision. This property was listed and sold by the previous owners as a <br />“knockdown” because of its age and condition. We are exiled, however, to be able to help <br />improve both the neighborhood appearance and character with our changes. A partial list <br />of improvements we will complete includes: <br />o Removal of all hardcover and an existing boat house in 0-75 ft zone, <br />o Reduction of hardcover in the 75-250 zone from 35.35% to 24 9%, <br />o Improvement of side lot setback from approximately 6 feel to 10 feet, <br />o Improvement of neighborhood drainage despite significant natural topography <br />that currently drives water to neighboring lots, <br />o Improvement of the energy efficiency and safety of the home itself while <br />sustaining the essential external character of the neighborhood, <br />o Restoration of our eroding lakcshore in cooperation with the neighbors to the <br />north and the relevant I^ke Minnetonka governing agencies <br />Preservation of neiithborlioods: <br />As we were considering various Twin Cities areas for relocation, the neighborhoods and <br />schools of Oiono quickly raised to the top of our list. Several of Kevin ’s colleagues at <br />General Mills described Oiono as very family focused and a community that valued <br />having a \ ai icty of family types along the same streets because of their scattered <br />development approach. This diversity is important to us as we raise cur children. We <br />agree with the city’s Community Management Plan wiicn it says: <br />“A/oi/ of Oruno*s exist iiif^ urban neighborhoods arc a homogenous mix of newer and <br />older homes intermingled with an occasional vacant lot or a larger, divisible lot There is <br />no sini*le ncifihhorhood which is in need of complete renewal or rehabiUtation ’ <br />We feel the dominant land ownership along one street and programmatic and complete <br />renewal of Westlake is contrary to this intention. <br />As we hopefully begin raising our three small children on the lake, we look forward to preserving <br />the traditions of our neighborhood. The essential character, we believe, has moic to do wi;h the <br />people of Westlake than a developer ’s vision. Families like the Anderson’s, Olson’s, and the <br />Hauer’s have lived there for decades, raised himilies, and defined that character We have <br />already spent hours under our backyard trees talking willi them and were instantly offered the use <br />of their docks for this summer as ours is in disrepair. For us. that is the essential character of <br />Weslakc, and of Orono, that is in need of preservation. We arc blessed to have the opportunity to <br />picserve this neighborhood as one of homes and families of many types and sizes We <br />lespcctfiilly request your support in domg so. <br />Best regards, <br />Kevin and Julie Fitzpatrick <br />Maple Grove, MN
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.