Laserfiche WebLink
f^04-3051 <br />September 20,2004 <br />Pages or5 <br />Lake neighborhood may be more actively moving towards larger lots but would beg the <br />question: Should they be forced? Staff would find it “out of the ordinary” for the City to <br />deny this variance request based on the position taken by the neighbors. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Are 10 ’ side yard setbacks yielding a 30 ’ wide building pad reasonable? <br />2. Would the proposed house be out of character with the neighborhood? <br />3. Should the applicants be required to wait to redevelop so that additional land can be <br />acquired? <br />4. Please review the Comprehensive Plan exceipts. Exhibit K. Does the proposed <br />redevelopment of this lot generally conform to the “Lakeshore Residential Land Use <br />Policies”? Does it conform to the “General Land Use Policies”? <br />5. Arc tlicre any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Approval of the requested variances as submitted.