Laserfiche WebLink
V <br />^04-3010 <br />August 16, 2004 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Right Side (south)10 ’ <br />26.2’ - house <br />73 ’ - detached <br />garage <br />ir <br />(10 ’ was previously <br />proposed) <br />Lakeshore <br />-------------------f <br />75’ <br />91.5 ’ - house <br />18.5 ’ - shed <br />88 ’ <br />( previously 90 ’ - <br />house ) <br />Average Lakeshore <br />71.5’ -98.5 ’ (going <br />north to south) <br />110 ’ -94 ’ <br />(conforming) <br />5.?’ <br />(94 ’ previously) <br />.^triicturAl Covera2<\ -----------------------------—--------------------------------------------------- <br />Total Lot Area Total Struct irni Coverage <br />21,926 s.f. (0.50 acres)Allowed; 3,2S9 s.f. (15%) <br />Proposed: 3,128 s.f. (14.3%) <br />Previouslv Proposed: 3.208 s f. (14 6%! <br />Hardcover Calculations , r <br />(A ivpo was made on the on the previous repon regarding the square fooiages in euch <br />however this typo did not affect the hardcover levels proposed. It is nowzone, <br />concciea.; <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0-75 7,698 s.f.0 s.f <br />(0%) <br />320 s.f.* <br />(4%) <br />0 s.f. <br />(0%) <br />75-250 14,228 s.f. <br />3,557 s.f. <br />(25%) <br />7,032 s.f.* <br />(49%) <br />1__ __ J ^ ^ A . A 1 A • <br />4,306 s.f. <br />(30%) <br />Previous: <br />4,676 s.f. <br />(32 S6%) <br />1 f* t ^ r-% 1 1 o 1 <br />driveways never approved by the City. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1 . Should this conforming lot be granted a hardcover variance? <br />2. What level of ground disturbance should be allowed within the 0-75’ lake yard? <br />3. Should the applicant be encouraged to reduce the footprint of the house, which is <br />cuiTcntly proposed at 2,288 square feet, not including the garage even though the <br />structural coverage requirement is met? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends denial of the hardcover variance and conditional use permit request. <br />The applicant should be encouraged to reduce the size of the house and/or garage. <br />Staff also recommends denial of the conditional use permit request as currently <br />presented. Following a site visit from the City Engineer the applicant will be directed to <br />an alternative solution for restoring the slope located between the 934 and 944 elevations.