My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
09-13-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 1:14:58 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 12:18:28 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />i <br />M04-3010 <br />August 16, 2004 <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />Date Application Received: 4-21-04 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete; 6-9-04 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 8-8-04 extended to 10-7-04 <br />To:Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From:Janice Gundlach. City Planner <br />Date:Auaust 12. 2004 <br />Subject:#04-3010, Theodore L. Capra, 3534 Ivy Place <br />- Hardcover Variance, Conditional Use Permit <br />- Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR - IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District ('/- acre min ) <br />0.50 acres (21,926 s.f.) <br />104 feet Shoreline; 101 feet @75' Setback <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following in order to construct a new <br />residence on an existing lot; . , <br />1. Hardcover variance to permit 30®/o hardcover within the 75 -2a0 zone where <br />25% is normally allowed and 49% currently exists. <br />2. Conditional use permit to allow land alterations within the 0-75 zone^ <br />Staff liecommeiulation: Staff recommends denial of the hardcover varia:ice as the <br />project is a rebuild and should be held to the 25% hardcover limitation and no valid <br />hardship has been demonstrated. Staff also recommends denial of the conditional use <br />permit to allow grading within 75' of the lake. Only one poition of the slope requires <br />restoration, which can be accomplished without grading the entire lake yard or <br />constiucting any retaining walls. The applicant is encouraged to investigate the use of <br />deep-rooted plant material like prairie grasses and/or wildliowers, other than turf grass, in <br />an effort to stabilize the existing slope.___________________ _________________ <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Revised Survey <br />Exhibit B - Revised Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit C - Revised Elevations <br />Exhibit D - Revised Floor Plans <br />Exlribit E - Photographs <br />Exhibit F - 60-Day Extension Letter <br />Exhibit G - PC Meeting Minutes of 6-21-04 <br />Exhibit H - PC Action Notice of 6-22-04 <br />Exhibit I - PC Report of 6-17-04 <br />Background <br />The applicant and the applicant’s architect have met with staff numerous times since the <br />June Planning Conunission meeting to discuss alternative site plans in an attempt to <br />d
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.