Laserfiche WebLink
1335 Tonkiwi - Height Issue <br />September 2,2004 <br />Page 2 <br />Code Deflnition <br />The building height definition in the code reads as follows: <br />^BuUdhtg height means the vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level <br />at the building or ten feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the <br />top of the cornice of a flat roof, or the deck line of a mansard roof, or the uppermost <br />point on a round or other arch type roof, or the average height of the highest gable of a <br />pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate the adjoining ground level <br />above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building height.’’ <br />Property History <br />This property was the middle lot ofa three-lot plat created in 1998. The 3 lots were then replatted a year <br />later to relocate lot lines and incorporate additional land, expanding tlie two westerly lots. A grading plan <br />proposing the creation ofa built-up building pad for this lot was provided with the initial subdivision <br />(Attachment C) but no revised grading plan was required or provided at the re-plat stage. Based on <br />applicant’s current submitted survey (Attachment E) the initial grading plan to raise the grade to 939.5' <br />for the middle lot was never fully accomplished, either as part of tlte subdivision or later. The existing grade <br />at the east end of the site is approximately 936.2 ’ where it tapers away from the home next door. The <br />existing grade where the house will be placed ranges from 932.9' to 936.4' per the submitted surv ey, which <br />suggests that portions of the lot were filled 2-3' when the home to the east was built. <br />Proposed House <br />The proposed house plans rely on applicant bringing in additional fill, resulting in a final grade along the <br />street side of the house ranging from 943.2 ’ to 943.7', i.e. as much as 7' of fill above the highest current <br />grade, 9' above the original highest grade, and 4’ above the liighest grade proposed with the subdivision <br />(see Attach meat D). The applicant’s intent is to create a walkout situation fr'om what was originally a flat <br />lot. <br />The house incorporates a pyramidal hipped roof system at the east end that encloses the first story as well <br />the half-story above it. This roof system includes a number of dormers. The very peak of the roof is <br />proposed at elevation 981.9’, approximately 49 feet above the existing grade of 932.9' at that location. <br />Height Measurement Codes & Policies <br />The City’s building height definition clearly specifies tlte lower point for measuring building height (see <br />definition above). However, in terms of the highest point, the determination of what constitute the “highest <br />gable” has become extremely difficult with the complex roof systems being deigned by architects today. <br />This topic has been a part of the Planning Commission ’s review of the issue of bui Iding heights, bulk and <br />massing that has been ongoing since 2001. As early as February2001 staff indicated in a memo to Council <br />and Planning Commission the policy being followed regarding determination of upper height measuring <br />point: