08-23-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JiiiHidi MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 9, 2004 7;00 o’clock p.m. (5. #02-2843 Professional Properties of Orono, Continued) Berg stated it is his understanding the lights need to have a certain number of lumens in order to light up the sidewalk. Berg indicated to his kjiowledgc the lighting complies with City codes. Berg inquired whether additional signage could be mounted on this building in the future. Gaffron stated the property is allowed one square foot of signage per foot of frontage and that currently this property has approximately one-third of the signage allowed under Cuy code. Gaffron noted any additional signage would need to be approved by the CiP/. Moorse recommended that consideration be given to standardizing all of the sign: on this building for aesthetic reasons should additional signage be added. White moved, McMillan seconded, to approve the PUD Amendment for a Wall Sign at Professional Properties of Orono, 2765 Kelley Parkway. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 6. #04-3029 MICHAEL KEAVENY, 3423/3425 SHORELINE DRIVE-COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW Peterson moved, Murphy seconded, to table Application #04-3029, Michael Keaveny, 3423/3425 Shoreline Drive, per the applicant's request. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *7. #04-3036 JAMES BROOKS, 3785 WATERTOWN ROAD - \'ARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 5212 Murphy moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5212, a Resolution granting a 12’ east side setback variance for the residence located at 3785 Watertown Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 8. #04-.3038 DARRELL ANDERSON/BRUCE DAYTON, 900/925/%5 OLD 3NG LAKE ROAD - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 5213 McMillan inquired why the surv'cy for the lot located at 965 Old Long Lake Road has a different lot size than the number given in the Planner ’s report. Gaffron stated there is a difference between the gross acreage and the net acreage based on the road right-of-way. Gaffron indicated the applicant ’s description of the property goes to the center of the roadway and the description of the property to the west goes to the section line north of the road. Gaffron noted the survey does not reflect the right-of-way. Gaffron stated the numbers in the Planner ’s report arc the gross acreages, including the road, and that the lot sizes for both 925 and 965 are less than two acres. Gaffron stated these lots were already substandard sized lots prior to the lot line rearrangement. White moved, McMillan seconded, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 5213, a Resolution granting subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for properties located at 900,925, and 965 Long Lake Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PAGE 4 ! 4