Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 5 I 61"__ <br />75’*250’ zone, 30% in the 250’-500’ zone and 35% in the 500’-1000’ <br />zone. <br />4. Section 78-1403: Variance to permit 16% Lot Coverage by Structures <br />when 15% is normally pennitted. <br />5. Section 78-1467 (3): Variance to permit an existing /,gn to be located 2’ <br />outside the property boundary. <br />6. Section 78-1516: Variance to parking stall requirement where City <br />Ordinance would technically require 147 stalls and only 104 stalls ai'c <br />proposed. <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendation <br />of the City staff and Plarming Commission; and the comments and written statements <br />submitted by the applicant. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota hereby denies the requested conditional use permit, commercial site plan <br />review and associated variances as described above based on one or more of the <br />following findings of fact concerning this property: <br />1. <br />2. <br />4. <br />Tlie property is in close proximity to the residential neighborhood to the <br />south. The entrance and parking area for the proposed use directly abuts <br />the adjacent residential neighborhood. <br />The potential for increased levels of noise, traffic, activity, public <br />disturbances, litter, damage to property, and calls to police that can <br />accompany a site which serves liquor, have a high potential to be <br />disruptive to the immediately adjacent residential neighborhood. <br />The City Council on March 22, 2004 denied a liquor license for the <br />proposed Class II restaurant. <br />The granting of the requested variances would be contrary to the <br />provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-123 with which the <br />applicant must first comply in order fiiat variances be granted. The <br />Council finds that: <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />i