Laserfiche WebLink
1/50 s.f. = 11 <br />Bowling Alley: <br />Game Room: <br />(amusement center) <br />2/alley » 20 <br />3/alley = 30 <br />4/alley = 40 <br />5/alley = 50 <br />6/alley = 60 <br />Average *= 8 <br />Average = 40 <br />1/200 s.f. + 1/2 coin machines *» 9 + ? <br />1/150 s.f.+ 1/4 seats =13 + 7 <br />1/50 s.f. = 38 <br />1/1 game table = ? <br />TOTAL =* 56 + Game Room Parking (maybe 45 machines) = 101 required spaces <br />(assuming a number of machines) <br />The applicant has proposed a plan with 104 parking stalls. The addition, at 16 ’ in width, <br />would obstruct eight of the 104 parking stalls proposed. If the addition were reduced to <br />14 ’ in width these parking stalls could remain, which the applicant has agreed to do. <br />After conducting this study staff discovered that the parking required by Section 78-1516 <br />of the Zoning Ordinance may actually fit in line with what the two studies suggest is <br />adequate parking for the proposed uses. There may be some justification for a parking <br />variance based on the 1991 parking study performed by the APA. <br />Weighing the restraints of providing pauking for the uses the building currently supports <br />and the game room proposed, the Planning Commission should discuss whether there are <br />hardships inherent to the site to support granting of a parking variance. The parking <br />study information is provided as a supplement in determining if there is a hardship and if <br />the site could support the amount of parking it demands. If the Planning Commission <br />determines that the uses proposed fit within the guidelines of tlie Zoning Ordinance, staff <br />would suggest that the applicant provide staff with a detailed floor plan that the City’s <br />parking consultant can use to determine the amount of parking the City should require. <br />(