My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
08-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 12:34:48 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:45:54 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, JULY 19.2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(6. #04-3029 MICHAEL KEAVENY, 3423/3425 SHORELINE DRIVE, COMMERCIAL <br />SITE PLAN REVIEW, PUBLIC HEARING- Continued) <br />Kempf asked Mr. Keaveny specifically what is a game room. Mr. Keaveny responded that the game <br />room could have video games, electronic games or a pool table. <br />Gundlach referred to the legal issue of trying to close a non-conforming use, and that the City was <br />unable to legally close a non-conforming use in the past due to an applicants efforts of working with <br />the City to get a particular application approved. Gundlach indicated the City had been to court on a <br />similar situation and lost. She indicated staff was advised that since Mr. Keaveny had been working <br />with staff, i.e. the City, no efforts should be taken at this time to close the non-conforming use. <br />Chair Rahn recommended concentrating on the issue of the non-conforming use. He observed that <br />the application is showing an additional 2000 s.f. which is an expansion of use, and he was not in <br />favor on supporting an expansion nor supporting a Zoning Code change for permitting a game room <br />in the B-1 zoning district. Chair Ralin concluded that any expansion of a non-conforming use is <br />against the Zoning Code. <br />nremer remarked that she appreciated Mr. Keaveny’s efforts to improve the building appearances. <br />Leslie observed that the fundamental issue is how to make the bowling alley a feasible business at its <br />current location, and that it may not be feasible there any longer. <br />Berg indicated she did not support any effort to rezone the location to allow the game room use. <br />Mr. Evans reiterated the position of Neighbors for a Better Navarre that the bowling alley is no <br />longer a non-conforming use as it has been closed for over one year. He advised their group will <br />consult with their attorney for possible future action. <br />Le.slie moved, Fritzler seconded, to recommend denial of Application #04-3029, Michael <br />Keaveny, 3423/3425 Shoreline Drive, for a commercial site plan review with variances in order <br />to conduct improvements to the existing building. <br />VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />7. #04-3030 MARTHA A.L. SPENCER, 1005 WILLOW DRTVT SOUTH, VARIANCE, <br />PUBLIC HEARING (6:45-6:50 p.m.) <br />Craig Lagorio. JLM Dcsign/Build, 7155 Cahill Road, Edina, representing the applicant, was present. <br />Curtis introduced the applicant’s request for a lake setback variance to allow grade level decks within <br />150’ of the OHWL c.; French Lake, a natural environment lake, and a hardcover variance w ithin the <br />0-75’ setbacK zone in order to construct lakeside decks over existing patios. She recommended <br />approval of the variances as requested as the existing home is located entirely within the required <br />150’ lake setback and half is located within 75* of the OHWL, with the stipulation that the applicant <br />remove all fabric and plastic liners on the property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.